What is the best anti virus for mac. I need to completely erase my mac, and reinstall Yosemite. It isn't just the antivirus program that does the job. . do Macs need anti-virus protection? About.com. Food; Health; Home; Money; Style; Tech; Travel; More Autos; Dating. Do You Really Need Mac Antivirus. Do I need an anti-virus program for my MacBook Pro? Does Apple offer an. I think that you don't need a classic antivirus for your mac these make your.
Anti Virus Software for Mini. Does this mean the Mini Mac is inherently protected from viruses and worms without. to install antivirus on your Mac..
Everything you need to know to protect your Mac. Mac Malware Guide : Do I need anti-virus software? <- How does Mac OS X protect me? One of the most frequent questions we are asked at Comparitech is does a Mac need antivirus protection? Macbook, Mac Pro or Mac Mini. Best Antivirus Software and Apps 2016. Best Mac Antivirus Software. You need an antivirus program on your Mac. Tom's Guide Deals. Mac mini; Mac Software; iPhone; iPad. Does a Mac need antivirus software? Best Mac antivirus software: Do Macs need antivirus & internet security. Does a mac need a antivirus? I was conviced for many years that mac os does not need a antivirus software. mac mini 1gb ram.
Does a mac need a antivirus? I use Clam. X, as well as Chk. Root. Kit. Both are free.
But to answer the original question.."I was conviced for many years that mac os does not need a antivirus software, as heard from everybody, except one that made me start thinking of a need of installing smth. Should I install smth?". I look at it, is, currently there are no known Mac Viruses for OSX, giving the Apple O/S many years of trouble free computing, which is unheard of in the software world. Now, would you buy a lock, for the barn door, to keep someone sneaky from trying to steal your horses?
I would. Would I pay for a *really expensive* one now, even though there haven't been any horse thieves around for years, and the ones that used to steal horses were in another state (i. No, I would not pay a lot of money for virus software right now (in fact, I won't pay anything). Therefore, just download the above (2) freeware programs now, from Versiontracker, and you should be fine, if and until, the horse thieves ever make their way back into town!: ) Vito.
Anti Virus Software for Mini. Jan,I've avoided responding to your post until now. Yes, renepo is a proof- of- concept. Yes, it requires explicit authorization to run. Can you claim that you never install and run software/freeware/shareware/utilities without thoroughly checking the source code for flaws? If so, do you believe that even a statistically significant minority of the people in this forum does so or has the skills and time to do so?
Better yet, what percentage of people browsing this site are using a user account with default administrator privileges? I disagree with the rest of your claim: A proof- of- concept released before 1.
Trojans could piggyback on privileges granted legitimate programs under sudo to self- install without user intervention or permission. The issue? Sudo administrator privileges remained in effect for 5 minutes. It was publicly known for more than two weeks. The hole was "easy" to plug - for a BSD hacker. The average Apple user, even if said user knew about and understood the vulnerability and was comfortable enough in Terminal to do the patching.. OSX user. As for the claim of a "clean" Win.
X PC running unprotected and open to the internet, I'm highly skeptical. Here's why: Of the ten most dangerous remote access internet security vulnerabilities for Windows operating systems (sans. Windows and 1. 0 Unix), seven affect Win.
X systems: W3, W4, W5, W6, W7, W9, and W1. Just to avoid nit- picking: W3 - Netbios (Windows 9. X TCPIP address acquisition), W5 - Windows authentication, W6 - Web browsers, and W9 - e- mail clients, have no fixes. ALL vulnerabilities discovered since Microsoft stopped supplying patches for the Win. X series (look it up) are wide open. These are REMOTE exploits - not viruses; although viruses have taken advantage of these vulnerabilities - that do not require user intervention.
It is possible that a Win. X client running behind a properly configured and hardened firewall is not "pwned" six ways from Sunday.
However, if the machine is sitting naked on the internet (which is how I understand your claim), somebody else owns it, is probably protecting it from viruses, and is using it for his/her own purposes. Your worst case: In addition to the damage you could have prevented to yourself, the damage inflicted on people who follow your advice in error. My worst case: If I leave any unnecessary services running, ports open, or have them misconfigured, I fix the problem myself, port a BSD cleanup tool, or install a clean backup and load the inevitable Apple patch. My investment in preventive maintenance? Proper permissions, user, system, and firewall configuration.
Properly configured and hardened hardware firewall. Clam. Xav is free/donationware and is set to automatically update. Install Apple patches and keep third- party apps up- to- date. Since I do these things anyway, I incur exactly $0 in additional costs. It's like proper and regular auto maintenance: It helps you avoid accidents. Failing that, regular preventive maintenance greatly increases your chance of surviving a wreck. Some reminders for your cost/benefit analysis: 1) A low overall risk can be overshadowed by the cost of the loss.
Calculation of probablility based on (lack of) prior events without reference to analogous and anomalous situations is misleading - the current hurricane season would be a good example of this. Risk assessment professionals consistently underestimate both costs and risks of rare events - Hurricane Andrew damage and the loss of the World Trade Center are good examples of this bias in the insurance industry.
Don't forget project management rule- of- thumb #1: Always double your time estimate and treble your budget estimate for a given project.- Wayne.